manner are certainly, infallibly, and effectually regenerated, and do actually believe.”
Finally, the Fifth Head of Doctrine reaffirms the confessional Reformed doctrine of perseverance of the saints. As Article 8 explains:
Thus, it is not in consequence of their own merits or strength, but of God’s free mercy, that they do not totally fall from faith and grace, nor continue and perish finally in their backslidings; which, with respect to themselves, is not only possible, but would undoubtedly happen; but with respect to God, it is utterly impossible, since His counsel cannot be changed nor His promise fail, neither can the call according to His purpose be revoked, nor the merit, intercession and preservation of Christ be rendered ineffectual, nor the sealing of the Holy Spirit be frustrated or obliterated.
Historical Impact
The Arminian challenge to the doctrine and practice of the Reformed Churches was far-reaching and long-lasting. Although the Synod of Dordt rejected the Remonstrant doctrines, the teachings survived in various ecclesiastical settings. Some Arminians continued to develop the doctrines in a more and more Pelagian direction. Others developed the doctrines along more evangelical lines. We see this, for example, in Wesleyan theology. Twentieth-century dispensationalists often referred to themselves as four-point Calvinists because they accepted one of the points of Arminianism—namely, unlimited atonement.
All of this started as a result of Arminius’ difficulties with predestination and his suggestion that election is conditional upon foreseen faith. Often, in contemporary debates, one will hear this idea expressed in these words: “God looks down the corridors of time and elects those whom He foresees will believe in Jesus.” A moment’s consideration, however, will reveal the serious problems with this idea. What exactly are “the corridors of time” that God is looking down, and where did these corridors come from? For God’s election to be truly as unconditional as Arminians desire, these “corridors” would have to exist independently of God. That, however, would lead us outside of biblical Christianity altogether. But if the “corridors” and all that is going on within them are not independent of God, then neither can election be conditional in the Arminian sense of the term. In other words, as the Synod of Dordt understood, if God is God, Arminian doctrine is ruled out.